Documents
Documents
Pacific Palisades Community Council Document Library
Library Search
Land Use
Browse all topics
Advanced Filters
-
GovernanceCoastalMinutesPlanning & Density
Pacific Palisades Community Council opposes AB 1287 (Alvarez) regarding density bonus provisions, arguing that the bill would allow projects in the Coastal Zone without environmental review of impacts on coastal resources and public safety. The council urges amendments to retain Coastal Act protections.
-
Land UseEventsMinutesPlanning & Density
This document proposes amendments to the Pacific Palisades Commercial Village and Neighborhoods Specific Plan to add new neighborhood areas (labeled as Neighborhood Area D and potentially others) with specific development standards including a 30-foot height limit, residential floor area ratios ranging from 0.55 to 0.65 based on lot size, lot coverage limits, encroachment planes, and side yard setbacks. The proposed standards are intended to apply development regulations consistent with R1V1 zoning to areas currently outside the Hillside Area.
-
Environment & Public SpacesParks & RecreationAgendasMotionsWracVHFHSZ
The Pacific Palisades Community Council wrote to City Councilmember Traci Park on March 13, 2023, requesting immediate action to establish a dog park in Pacific Palisades, citing concerns that off-leash dogs at the newly opened George Wolfberg Park at Potrero Canyon are threatening the park's riparian habitat and noting the community's consistent support for a dog park since 2018.
-
Land UseAgendasMotionsWracSignageVHFHSZ
The Pacific Palisades Community Council unanimously opposes the Interactive Kiosk Experience (IKE) program in Council File 22-1154, citing concerns about digital advertising structures on scenic highways like Sunset Boulevard, lack of competitive bidding, absence of financial and environmental analysis, visual pollution, and driver distraction.
-
Land UseWracSignage
Pacific Palisades Community Council opposed the Interactive Kiosk Experience (IKE) program in Council File 22-1154, citing concerns including potential violations of Scenic Highways guidelines, lack of local competitive bidding, absence of financial and environmental analysis, visual pollution, and driver distraction hazards. The motion was passed by the PPCC Board on January 12, 2023.